๐Ÿ“‹ Live Case Study

Department Diagnostic โ€” Pro Report

Multi-team engineering department. Real diagnostic data from a TAD Pro engagement. This is what a full department intelligence report looks like.

14
/30
Delivery Risk
8 teams assessed ยท Department average 13.9/30
Centralized QA Function

The primary bottleneck identified above represents the highest-leverage structural constraint degrading delivery performance across the department.

SLE: absentConfidence: low
TeamFlowWIPThroughputIntakeStructureVisibilityTotalBand
Infrastructureoutlier43334320Functional
Data & Analytics33333318Functional
API Gateway32333216Delivery Risk
Platform Core22233214Delivery Risk
Growth22222212Delivery Risk
Mobile Squad21223212Delivery Risk
Quality & Releaseoutlier12122210Systemic Failure
Consumer Appsoutlier1122219Systemic Failure
๐Ÿš€
Infrastructure

Scores 6.1 points above department average. Investigate what they're doing differently โ€” this team's practices should be replicated.

๐Ÿšจ
Quality & Release

Scores 3.9 points below department average. This team needs immediate intervention and targeted support.

๐Ÿšจ
Consumer Apps

Scores 4.9 points below department average. This team needs immediate intervention and targeted support.

This is what we do for your team.

A Pro engagement surfaces what a Lite diagnostic only hints at โ€” cross-team patterns, outlier detection, and the structural root causes leadership can't see from inside the system.

Run Your Free Lite DiagnosticRequest Pro Diagnostic โ†’